Assessment of CD4, CD8 and White Cell Parameters Amongst HIV Seronegative Pregnant Subjects in Port Harcourt, Nigeria

Solomon Ovomarani Akevwighome; Bruno Chukwuemeka Chinko; Sunday Ogbu Ojeka; Kinikanwo Innocent Green; Datonye Victor Dapper

doi:doi:10.11648/j.sf.20240502.11

Research Article |

| Peer-Reviewed

Assessment of CD4, CD8 and White Cell Parameters Amongst HIV Seronegative Pregnant Subjects in Port Harcourt, Nigeria

Solomon Ovomarani Akevwighome^*

, Bruno Chukwuemeka Chinko

, Sunday Ogbu Ojeka

, Kinikanwo Innocent Green

, Datonye Victor Dapper

Published in Science Frontiers (Volume 5, Issue 2)

Received: 10 March 2024 Accepted: 25 March 2024 Published: 11 April 2024

Views: Downloads:

Download PDF

Share This Article

Twitter
Linked In
Facebook

Abstract

Pregnancy involves maternal immunological adjustments to accommodate the fetus and maintain a strong immune defense against potential pathogens. The present study evaluated the changes in CD4, CD8, white blood cell (WBC) and total lymphocyte count (TLC) amongst HIV seronegative pregnant subjects in Port Harcourt, Nigeria. A total of 302 female subjects (18-39 years) were recruited for the study. They consisted of 205 pregnant subjects and 97 non-pregnant subjects which served as the control. All subjects were screened for HIV type 1 and type 2 using standard test kits. Total and differential white blood cell counts were determined using a haematology auto analyzer while the total lymphocyte count (TLC) was obtained by multiplying total white blood cell count (TWC) with percentage lymphocyte count. The CD4 and CD8 cell counts were analyzed using the automated flow cytometry analyzer while the CD4:CD8 cell count ratio was obtained by dividing the CD4 cell count value by that of CD8. The result of the study shows a statistically significant decrease in CD4 and CD8 cell counts, lymphocyte and total lymphocyte counts and an increase in neutrophil count in all the trimesters of pregnancy when compared to the non-pregnant control (p<0.05). Also, there was a significant increase in WBC during the third trimester and a similar decrease in monocyte count in the first and third trimesters of pregnancy. The evidence from the present study concludes that pregnancy modifies the maternal immune response to ensure fetal survival and the protection of the mother from invading pathogens as reported in the increase in total WBC, neutrophil and monocyte counts and a reduction in TLC, CD4 and CD8 counts. The study recommends routine assessments of these crucial cellular immune markers for pregnant women during antenatal visits.

Published in	Science Frontiers (Volume 5, Issue 2)
DOI	10.11648/j.sf.20240502.11
Page(s)	74-80
Creative Commons	This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited.
Copyright	Copyright © The Author(s), 2024. Published by Science Publishing Group

Keywords

CD4 Count, CD8 Count, CD4:CD8 Ratio, Total Lymphocyte Count, Total White Blood Cell Count and Pregnancy

1. Introduction

Pregnancy, also known as gestation, encompasses the period from fertilization of an embryo to childbirth, typically lasting about nine months and divided into trimesters of three months each. Throughout this period, a woman's body undergoes substantial anatomic, physiologic, and metabolic adaptations essential for accommodating the developing fetus and preparing for childbirth, lactation, and postnatal care

[1-3]

. These adaptations are intricately interlinked and impact all body systems, primarily influenced by the hormonal activities of the placenta

[4, 5]

. Maternal physiology experiences significant adjustments to facilitate the growth of the fetus, creating a unique challenge for the maternal immune system which must tolerate the presence of the fetus, and at the same time maintain a relatively strong immune response against invading pathogens

[6, 7]

. One essential aspect of the immune system is its role in safeguarding the host against pathogens. This capability relies on the innate immune system's ability to orchestrate cell migration for surveillance and to identify and react to incoming microorganisms. During normal pregnancy, the human decidua, the epithelial layer of the endometrium harbours a substantial population of immune cells such as natural killer (NK) cells (70%), macrophages (20 – 25%), dendritic (1.7%) and regulatory T cells (3 – 10%)

[8-10]

The T lymphocytes, commonly known as T cells, are a type of white blood cell that plays a central role in the immune system. They are a key component of the adaptive immune response, which is the body's specialized defence mechanism against specific pathogens. Subtypes of the T lymphocytes include the helper T cells (CD4), the cytotoxic T cells (CD8) and the memory T cells. They work in coordination with other components of the immune system, such as the B cells, macrophages, and dendritic cells, to mount a targeted and specific defence against pathogens and the elimination of infected or abnormal cells

[11, 12]

. The CD4 cells are primarily responsible for orchestrating and coordinating the immune response via the interaction with other immune cells such as B cells and cytotoxic T cells and releasing signalling molecules called cytokines. These cytokines regulate the immune response, enhancing the activity of other immune cells. Similarly, CD8 cells, also known as cytotoxic T cells responsible for the recognition and destruction of infected cells and the activation of cell-mediated immunity. Both CD4 and CD8 cells are involved in immune “memory” as the cells "remember" previous encounters with specific pathogens, leading to a faster and more effective immune response upon subsequent exposure

[12, 13]

Report on cyclical changes in CD4, total white blood cell and differential eosinophil, basophil and neutrophil as well as other haematological parameters during the menstrual cycle of healthy undergraduate students in Port Harcourt, Nigeria had been documented in our centre

[14]

. Meanwhile, several reports on increased white blood cells and differential neutrophils and monocytes during pregnancy have been established

[3, 15-17]

. Though, the report on total lymphocyte count during the trimesters of pregnancy is relatively scanty, an increase in total lymphocyte count from the first to third trimester of pregnancy has been reported in Punjabi, India

[18]

. An increase in CD4 absolute count has been reported in Ekpoma, Nigeria

[19]

. However, despite its physiological importance, baseline data on CD4 and CD8 cell counts, total lymphocyte count and CD4:CD8 cell count ratio during pregnancy amongst HIV seronegative pregnant subjects in Port Harcourt, Nigeria is not readily available. The present study evaluates the changes in CD4, CD8, white blood cell and total lymphocyte count amongst HIV seronegative pregnant subjects in Port Harcourt, Nigeria. This will provide more insight into the pattern of change in these cell-mediated immune markers during pregnancy.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Study Population and Research Design

This was a cross-sectional descriptive study. A total of 302 female subjects (18-39 years) were recruited for the study. They consisted of 205 pregnant subjects and 97 non-pregnant subjects which served as the control. The pregnant subjects were further divided into three groups according to the trimesters of pregnancy consisting of 33, 79 and 93 subjects in their first, second and third trimester of pregnancy respectively. All pregnant subjects were attending antenatal care visits in tertiary and secondary health facilities in Port Harcourt, Nigeria. The non-pregnant subjects were recruited from the staff of the University of Port Harcourt, Nigeria. All subjects with known cardiovascular and metabolic diseases and all pregnant subjects with known pregnancy complication(s) were excluded from the study.

2.2. Data and Sample Collection

A basic questionnaire was employed to obtain details such as the participants' age and gestational age. The height and weight of the subjects were measured using a Secca scale. Body mass index (BMI) was calculated by dividing the weight (kg) of the subjects by the square of their heights (m). The diastolic and systolic blood pressures of all subjects were measured using a standard mercury sphygmomanometer after they were made to rest for about 30 minutes. The blood pressure measurements were done from the left arm of all subjects in a comfortably seated position. Successive measurements were done until two consecutive measurements with the same readings were obtained. The mean arterial pressure (MAP) of all subjects was determined from this formula: MAP = DBP +1/3 pulse pressure. About 5ml of venous blood was collected from the antecubital vein of each subject, transferred into EDTA sample bottles and carefully mixed. Blood samples were collected each day within the hours of 9 AM to 12 PM.

2.3. Laboratory Analysis

All samples were screened for HIV type 1 and type 2 (HIV-1 and HIV-2) using DetermineHIV-1/2 test kits (Abbot, USA). Total and differential white blood cell counts were determined using a haematology auto analyzer (Sysmex Corporation Kobe, Japan). Total lymphocyte count was obtained by multiplying total white blood cell count with percentage lymphocyte count

[15]

. CD4 and CD8 cell counts were analyzed using the automated flow cytometry analyzer (Partec GmbH Görlitz. Germany) while the CD4:CD8 cell count ratio was obtained by dividing the CD4 cell count value by that of CD8

[20]

2.4. Ethical Considerations

The procedures in this study adhered to the most stringent ethical guidelines outlined in the World Medical Association (WMA) Helsinki Declaration of 1963, updated in 2013

[34]

. Before enrollment in the study, each potential participant signed a consent form. The research design and protocol received approval from the Research Ethics Committee of the University of Port-Harcourt (UPH/CEREMAD/REC/M66/008).

2.5. Data Analysis

Data from this study were analyzed using SPSS version 25. The mean and standard error were calculated for all parameters. The ANOVA followed by an LDS post hoc analysis was used to determine the differences among the non-pregnant controls and the pregnant subjects in their various trimesters. The differences between groups were considered statistically significant at a p-value less than 0.05 (p< 0.05).

3. Results

Table 1. Age, anthropometric parameters and blood pressure indices of pregnant and non-pregnant subjects.

Parameters	Non-pregnant (n=97)	1st trimester (n=33)	2nd trimester (n=79)	3rd trimester (n=93)
Age (years)	25.63±0.07	25.00±0.70	26.34±0.53	27.40±0.49
Body mass index (kg/m²)	24.46±0.32	26.20±0.69	30.81±0.32*	33.89*±0.41
Systolic blood pressure (mmHg)	111.75±0.75	111.52±1.24	111.27±1.02	109.73±1.11
Diastolic blood pressure (mmHg)	72.62±0.78	71.67±1.42	73.42±0.92	72.85±0.93
Mean arterial pressure (mmHg)	85.29±0.70	84.95±1.32	86.03±0.89	84.39±1.08

Values are mean±SEM, * Showing a significant difference when compared to non-pregnant subjects (p<0.05).

Table 1 displays the age, body mass index (BMI), and blood pressure parameters (systolic, diastolic, and mean arterial pressure) of both pregnant and non-pregnant subjects in the study. As anticipated, a notable difference in BMI was observed among pregnant participants during the second and third trimesters compared to the non-pregnant control (p<0.05). BMI was highest during the third trimester, followed by the second trimester. The mean values for blood pressure parameters (systolic, diastolic, and mean arterial pressure) in the pregnant groups were comparable to those in the non-pregnant group.

Table 2. Values of total white blood cell and differential lymphocyte, neutrophil, and monocyte cell counts and total lymphocyte count of pregnant and non-pregnant subjects.

Parameter	Non-pregnant (n=97)	1^st trimester (n=33)	2^nd trimester (n=79)	3^rd trimester (n=93)
Total white blood cell (cell/µl)	7.79±0.05	7.50±0.31	7.81±0.18	9.67*±0.18
Lymphocyte count (%)	64.09±0.60	24.14*±0.83	25.05*±0.58	20.84*±2.33
Neutrophil count (%)	26.01±0.51	63.38*±0.79	65.34*±0.40	61.35*±.83
Monocyte count (%)	8.25±0.25	12.44*±0.55	9.61±0.31	12.11*±2.07
Total lymphocyte count (%cell/µl)	501.00±6.35	178.46*±3.47	184.10*±3.08	201. *±6.43

Values are mean±SEM, * Showing a significant difference when compared to non-pregnant subjects (p<0.05).

Table 2 illustrates the values of total white blood cell count, differential lymphocyte, neutrophil, monocyte and total lymphocyte count of both pregnant and non-pregnant subjects in the study. The data shows a statistically significant increase in neutrophil count in all trimesters of pregnancy compared to the non-pregnant control (p<0.05). The total white blood cell count was significantly increased during the third trimester compared to the non-pregnant control (p<0.05) while monocyte count was significantly increased in the first trimester of pregnancy compared to the non-pregnant control. However, a significant decrease in differential lymphocyte and total lymphocyte count was observed in all trimesters of pregnancy when compared to the non-pregnant control group (p<0.05).

Table 3. Values of CD4 count, CD8 count and CD4:CD8 cell count ratio parameters of pregnant and non-pregnant subjects.

Parameters	Non-pregnant (n=97)	1^st trimester (n=33)	2^nd trimester (n=79)	3^rd trimester (n=93)
CD4 (cell/µl)	957.51±17.67	630.58*±26.52	795.92*±22.04	692.65*±0.65
CD8 (cell/µl)	908.43±17.78	471.33*±20.01	543.46*±16.17	545.43*±28.35
CD4:CD8 count ratio	1.13±0.04	1.36*±0.04	1.50*±0.03	1.38*±0.04

Values are mean±SEM, * Showing a significant difference when compared to non-pregnant subjects (p<0.05).

Table 3 shows the values of CD4 and CD8 cell counts and CD4:CD8 cell count ratio of both pregnant and non-pregnant subjects in the study. The data indicates a statistically significant decrease in the CD4 and CD8 cell counts in all trimesters of pregnancy when compared to the non-pregnant control group (p<0.05). It also shows a statistically significant increase in the CD4:CD8 cell count ratio when compared to the non-pregnant participants (p<0.05).

4. Discussion

The maternal body undergoes significant physiological changes to support fetal growth, posing a distinct challenge to the maternal immune system. It must both accommodate the presence of the fetus and sustain a robust immune defence against potential pathogens. In this study, we examined the alterations caused by pregnancy in the maternal immune system, specifically examining changes in circulating CD4, CD8, white blood cell, and total lymphocyte count across the trimesters of pregnancy among HIV seronegative pregnant individuals.

Data from the study indicates a significant increase in the BMI of pregnant subjects during the second and third trimesters compared to the non-pregnant control (p<0.05) (Table 1). Weight gain during pregnancy is a natural occurrence primarily attributed to several factors, including the formation of the placenta, expansion of fluid volume, increased uterine weight, development of amniotic fluid, and accumulation of maternal fat, protein, and other essential nutrients

[21, 22]

. Reports from previous studies relate preterm delivery to reduced weight gained before pregnancy

[23, 24]

. The weight gained by the population under study is apparently normal. This is however expected as the present study excluded all metabolically compromised subjects. Though preeclampsia and eclampsia in normal pregnancy leading to maternal and fetal mortality and morbidity had been reported

[25, 26]

, the present study does not indicate any gestational complication. There was no significant difference in all blood pressure parameters between the pregnant and non-pregnant subjects. This could be due to the exclusion of all subjects with known cardiovascular disease.

The study also showed a statistically significant increase in the values of total white blood cell count in the third trimester, neutrophil in all trimesters, and monocyte in the first and third trimesters. However, there was a significant reduction in differential lymphocyte and total lymphocyte count when compared to apparently healthy non-pregnant participants (p<0.05) (Table 2). These findings are fairly in tandem with previous reports from Nigeria

[3, 16, 27-30]

and other parts of the world

[31, 32]

. Pregnancy has traditionally been linked to leukocytosis, characterized by an enhanced inflammatory response marked by elevated levels of circulating neutrophils which have been detected as early as the second month of gestation

[33, 34]

. Additionally, the rise in neutrophils could stem from a stress reaction triggered by the redistribution of white blood cells between marginal and circulating pools. There's also a suggestion that a decrease in neutrophil apoptosis, chemotaxis, and phagocytic activity contributes to their increased numbers in circulation

[35, 36]

. Previous studies have documented a decline in overall lymphocyte count during pregnancy

[37-39]

, a trend that aligns with our results. However, contrary to other findings, our study did not detect an elevation in lymphocyte count during the third trimester. The possible reason for these variations is not very clear, however, the immune system may have adapted to the presence of the fetus, which is genetically different from the mother by reducing the number of circulating lymphocytes to avoid rejecting the fetus, which could lead to miscarriage or preterm birth, while still maintaining the ability to fight off infections that could harm the mother or the fetus

[40]

Significant reductions in the CD4 and CD8 counts and an increase in the CD4:CD8 cell count ratio were observed among the pregnant subjects when compared to the non-pregnant control (p<0.05) (Table 3). This decrease in absolute CD4 and CD8 cell counts is corroborated by reports from other parts of Nigeria

[19, 41]

, Japan

[42]

, USA

[43]

while the increase in CD4:CD8 cell count ratio is in tandem with a report from Lagos, Nigeria

[41]

. The reasons for the decrease in the immune elements are not clear but adaptation and downregulation of cell-mediated maternal immune response to the developing fetus have been indicated to be a possible factor

[40, 44]

. However, this apparent downregulation of cell-mediated immunity as proposed by the classical model of immunity

[45]

leading to the maternal immune tolerance of the fetus has also been indicated as a major factor causing vulnerability to infections during pregnancy

[46]

5. Conclusion

Pregnancy necessitates maternal immunological adjustments to support the fetus while preserving robust immune defences against potential pathogens. Due to the lack of local data on the dynamics of white blood cell, CD4, and CD8 counts during pregnancy, this study was initiated. The present study reports a significant increase in total white blood cell count and differential neutrophil and monocyte counts with an increase in CD4:CD8 cell count ratio and a significant reduction in total lymphocyte count (TLC), differential lymphocyte count, absolute CD4 and CD8 cell count during pregnancy. Based on the findings of this study, we recommend the incorporation of regular assessments of CD4 and CD8 levels during antenatal appointments. The research underscores the importance for physicians in our setting to take into account the pregnancy status of their female patients when interpreting the results of these crucial cellular immune markers. This study can lay the groundwork for cohort studies investigating both cellular and non-cellular immune variations throughout pregnancy. This could lead to a better understanding of how these immune markers impact maternal health, fetal development, and pregnancy outcomes, ultimately contributing to improved prenatal care and therapeutic interventions.

Abbreviations

CD4: Cluster of Differentiation 4

CD8: Cluster of Differentiation 8

WBC: White Blood Cell

TLC: Total Lymphocyte Count

HIV: Human Immunodeficiency Virus

SEM: Standard Error of the Mean

DBP: Diastolic Blood Pressure

MAP: Mean Arterial Pressure

BMI: Body Mass Index

Author Contributions

Solomon Ovomarani Akevwighome: Data curation, Investigation, Methodology, Writing - original draft

Bruno Chukwuemeka Chinko: Data curation, Formal Analysis, Supervision, Writing - original draft, Writing - review & editing

Sunday Ogbu Ojeka: Funding acquisition, Methodology, Investigation, Project administration

Kinikanwo Innocent Green: Funding acquisition, Investigation, Methodology, Project administration

Datonye Victor Dapper: Conceptualization, Project administration, Writing - review & editing

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

[1]	Tan EK, Tan EL. Alterations in physiology and anatomy during pregnancy. Best practice & research Clinical obstetrics & gynaecology. 2013; 27(6): 791-802.
[2]	Cheek TG, Gutsche BB. Maternal physiologic alterations during pregnancy. Anesthesia for obstetrics. 4ª edición. Filadelfia: LW&W. 2002: 3-18.
[3]	Awajiomowa J, Chinko BC, Green KI. Haematological Parameters and Oxidative Stress Changes in Apparently Healthy Pregnant Women in Bori, Nigeria. International Journal of Research and Reports in Hematology. 2022; 5(4): 30-9.
[4]	Amadi CN, Chinko BC, Green KI. Changes in Serum Growth and Cortisol among Pregnant Women in Port Harcourt, Nigeria. Sch Int J Obstet Gynec. 2022; 5(1): 21-5.
[5]	Norwitz ER, Robinson JN, Malone FD. Pregnancy-Induced Physiologic Alterations. Critical care obstetrics. 2004: 19-42.
[6]	Poole JA, Claman HN. Immunology of pregnancy: implications for the mother. Clinical reviews in allergy & immunology. 2004; 26: 161-70.
[7]	Mor G, Cardenas I. The immune system in pregnancy: a unique complexity. American journal of reproductive immunology. 2010; 63(6): 425-33.
[8]	Aluvihare VR, Kallikourdis M, Betz AG. Regulatory T cells mediate maternal tolerance to the fetus. Nature immunology. 2004; 5(3): 266-71.
[9]	Wicherek L, Basta P, Pitynski K, Marianowski P, Kijowski J, Wiatr J, Majka M. The Characterization of the Subpopulation of Suppressive B7H4+ Macrophages and the Subpopulation of CD25+ CD4+ and FOXP3+ Regulatory T-cells in Decidua during the Secretory Cycle Phase, Arias Stella Reaction, and Spontaneous Abortion–A Preliminary Report. American journal of reproductive immunology. 2009; 61(4): 303-12.
[10]	Sanguansermsri D, Pongcharoen S. Pregnancy immunology: decidual im-mune cells. Asian Pacific journal of allergy and immunology. 2008; 26(2-3): 171.
[11]	Fabbri M, Smart C, Pardi R. T lymphocytes. The International Journal of Biochemistry & Cell Biology. 2003; 35(7): 1004-8.
[12]	Ochoa JB, Makarenkova V. T lymphocytes. Critical care medicine. 2005; 33(12): S510-S3.
[13]	Beverley PCL, Maini MK. Differences in the regulation of CD4 and CD8 T–cell clones during immune responses. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences. 2000; 355(1395): 401-6.
[14]	Dapper DV, Kote N, Akevwighome SO, Nworah DC. Changes in total and differential white cell counts, total lymphocyte and CD4 cell counts during the menstrual cycle in healthy female undergraduate students in Port Harcourt, Nigeria. Port Harcourt Medical Journal. 2012; 6(1): 2-9.
[15]	Dapper DV, Didia BC. Haemorheological parameters of umbilical cord blood of Nigerian newborns: correlations with maternal parameters. West African Journal of Medicine. 2006; 25(3): 226-30.
[16]	Pughikumo OC, Pughikumo DT, Omunakwe HE. White blood cell counts in pregnant women in Port Harcourt, Nigeria. IOSR Journal of Dental and Medical Sciences (IOSR-JDMS). 2015; 14(3): 01-3.
[17]	Amah-Tariah F, Ojeka S, Dapper D. Haematological values in pregnant women in Port Harcourt, Nigeria II: Serum iron and transferrin, total and unsaturated iron binding capacity and some red cell and platelet indices. Niger J Physiol Sci. 2011; 26(2): 173-8.
[18]	Jassal V, Dass C, Garg P, Bodal VK, Kaur S, Mohi MK, Neki N. A Study of Total Leucocyte Count and Platelets in Antenatal Care Centre in Tertiary Care Hospital Punjab.
[19]	Babatope IO, Isabu PA, Imarenezor EPK, Adesanya TM, Ikhimiukor AP. Normal CD4, CD8 T-lymphocytes and leucocyte baseline in healthy HIV-seronegative pregnant women in Ekpoma, Edo State, Nigeria. International Journal of Basic, Applied and Innovative Research. 2018; 7(1): 18-28.
[20]	Dapper V, Emem-Chioma P, Didia B. Some hematological parameters and the prognostic values of CD4, CD8 and total lymphocyte counts and CD4/CD8 cell count ratio in healthy HIV sero-negative, healthy HIV sero-positive and AIDS subjects in Port Harcourt, Nigeria. Turk J Haematol. 2008; 25(4): 181-6.
[21]	Truong YN, Yee LM, Caughey AB, Cheng YW. Weight gain in pregnancy: does the Institute of Medicine have it right? American journal of obstetrics and gynecology. 2015; 212(3): 362. e1-. e8.
[22]	Abrams B, Altman SL, Pickett KE. Pregnancy weight gain: still controversial. The American journal of clinical nutrition. 2000; 71(5): 1233S-41S.
[23]	Schieve LA, Cogswell ME, Scanlon KS, Perry G, Ferre C, Blackmore-Prince C, et al. Prepregnancy body mass index and pregnancy weight gain: associations with preterm delivery. Obstetrics & Gynecology. 2000; 96(2): 194-200.
[24]	Carmichael SL, Abrams B. A critical review of the relationship between gestational weight gain and preterm delivery. Obstetrics & Gynecology. 1997; 89(5): 865-73.
[25]	Bilano VL, Ota E, Ganchimeg T, Mori R, Souza JP. Risk factors of pre-eclampsia/eclampsia and its adverse outcomes in low-and middle-income countries: a WHO secondary analysis. PloS one. 2014; 9(3): e91198.
[26]	Duley L. The Global Impact of Pre-eclampsia and Eclampsia. Seminars in Perinatology. 2009; 33(3): 130-7.
[27]	Mba CO, Jacob RB, Green MB, Zebedee LU. Hematological Profile of Pregnant Women in Port Harcourt, Nigeria. International Journal of Translational Medical Research and Public Health. 2019; 3(1): 1-10.
[28]	Musa AU, Ndakotsu MA, Panti AA, Shehu CE, Kaoje AU. Haematological variables of healthy pregnant women in Sokoto, North-western Nigeria. Sub-Saharan African Journal of Medicine. 2016; 3(4): 194.
[29]	Mutua D, Njagi EM, Orinda GO. Hematological profile of normal pregnant women. J Blood Lymph. 2018; 8(2): 1-6.
[30]	Okpokam DC, Okhormhe ZA, Ernest NA, Udoh KN, Akpotuzor JO, Emeribe AO. Comparative study of some haematological parameters of pregnant women in Akpabuyo local government area of Cross River State, Nigeria. Der Pharmacia Lettre. 2015; 7(7): 1-5.
[31]	Taj N, Muhammad A, Mir A, Khan MJ. Changes in hematological parameters during different trimesters of pregnancy. Bull. Environ. Pharmacol. Life Sci. 2019; 8(9): 22-7.
[32]	Thanoon AH, Sultan AS, Hameed BH. Maternal hematological profile from the first to third trimester of pregnancy in normal pregnant Iraqi women. Plant Arch. 2020; 2(20): 6528-32.
[33]	Chandra S, Tripathi AK, Mishra S, Amzarul M, Vaish AK. Physiological Changes In Hematological Parameters During Pregnancy. Indian journal of hematology and blood transfusion. 2012; 28(3): 144-6.
[34]	Kaur S, Khan S, Nigam A. Hematological Profile And Pregnancy: A Review. Int J Adv Med. 2014; 1(2): 68-70.
[35]	Gatti L, Tenconi PM, Guarneri D, Bertulessi C, Ossola MW, Bosco P, Gianotti GA. Hemostatic Parameters And Platelet Activation By Flow-Cytometry In Normal Pregnancy: A Longitudinal Study. International Journal of Clinical and Laboratory Research. 1994; 24(4): 217-9.
[36]	Crocker IP, Baker PN, Fletcher J. Neutrophil Function In Pregnancy And Rheumatoid Arthritis. Annals Of The Rheumatic Diseases. 2000; 59(7): 555-64.
[37]	Dockree S, Shine B, Pavord S, Impey L, Vatish M. White blood cells in pregnancy: reference intervals for before and after delivery. EBioMedicine. 2021; 74.
[38]	Abbassi-Ghanavati M, Greer LG, Cunningham FG. Pregnancy and laboratory studies: A reference table for clinicians. Obstetrics and Gynecology. 2009; 114(6): 1326-31.
[39]	Obeagu EI, Adepoju OJ, Okafor CJ, Obeagu GU, Ibekwe AM, Okpala PU, Agu CC. Assessment of Haematological Changes in Pregnant Women of Ido, Ondo State, Nigeria. J Res Med Dent Sci. 2021; 9(4): 145-8.
[40]	Abu-Raya B, Michalski C, Sadarangani M, Lavoie PM. Maternal immunological adaptation during normal pregnancy. Frontiers in immunology. 2020; 11: 575197.
[41]	Babah OA, Oluwole AA, Adeyemo TA, Afolabi BB, Oye-Adeniran BA, Okorie O, Aderolu M. Effects of Pregnancy on CD4 and CD8 T-Lymphocyte subsets and Determination of Best Parameter for Assessing Immunity in Pregnancy. Journal of medical science and Clinical Research. 2014; 2(5): 873-89.
[42]	Watanabe M, Iwatani Y, Hidaka Y, Mitsuda N, Amino N. Changes in soluble CD4 and CD8 proteins in healthy pregnant and postpartum women. American Journal of Reproductive Immunology. 1996; 36(4): 220-7.
[43]	Towers CV, Rumney PJ, Ghamsary MG. Longitudinal study of CD4+ cell counts in HIV-negative pregnant patients. The Journal of Maternal-Fetal & Neonatal Medicine. 2010; 23(10): 1091-6.
[44]	Lissauer D, Eldershaw SA, Inman CF, Coomarasamy A, Moss PA, Kilby MD. Progesterone promotes maternal–fetal tolerance by reducing human maternal T-cell polyfunctionality and inducing a specific cytokine profile. European journal of immunology. 2015; 45(10): 2858-72.
[45]	Norton MT, Fortner KA, Oppenheimer KH, Bonney EA. Evidence that CD8 T-cell homeostasis and function remain intact during murine pregnancy. Immunology. 2010; 131(3): 426-37.
[46]	Bonney EA. Preeclampsia: a view through the danger model. Journal of reproductive immunology. 2007; 76(1-2): 68-74.

Cite This Article

Plain Text BibTeX RIS

APA Style

Akevwighome, S. O., Chinko, B. C., Ojeka, S. O., Green, K. I., Dapper, D. V. (2024). Assessment of CD4, CD8 and White Cell Parameters Amongst HIV Seronegative Pregnant Subjects in Port Harcourt, Nigeria. Science Frontiers, 5(2), 74-80. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.sf.20240502.11

Copy | Download

ACS Style

Akevwighome, S. O.; Chinko, B. C.; Ojeka, S. O.; Green, K. I.; Dapper, D. V. Assessment of CD4, CD8 and White Cell Parameters Amongst HIV Seronegative Pregnant Subjects in Port Harcourt, Nigeria. Sci. Front. 2024, 5(2), 74-80. doi: 10.11648/j.sf.20240502.11

Copy | Download

AMA Style

Akevwighome SO, Chinko BC, Ojeka SO, Green KI, Dapper DV. Assessment of CD4, CD8 and White Cell Parameters Amongst HIV Seronegative Pregnant Subjects in Port Harcourt, Nigeria. Sci Front. 2024;5(2):74-80. doi: 10.11648/j.sf.20240502.11

Copy | Download

@article{10.11648/j.sf.20240502.11,
  author = {Solomon Ovomarani Akevwighome and Bruno Chukwuemeka Chinko and Sunday Ogbu Ojeka and Kinikanwo Innocent Green and Datonye Victor Dapper},
  title = {Assessment of CD4, CD8 and White Cell Parameters Amongst HIV Seronegative Pregnant Subjects in Port Harcourt, Nigeria
},
  journal = {Science Frontiers},
  volume = {5},
  number = {2},
  pages = {74-80},
  doi = {10.11648/j.sf.20240502.11},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.sf.20240502.11},
  eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.sf.20240502.11},
  abstract = {Pregnancy involves maternal immunological adjustments to accommodate the fetus and maintain a strong immune defense against potential pathogens. The present study evaluated the changes in CD4, CD8, white blood cell (WBC) and total lymphocyte count (TLC) amongst HIV seronegative pregnant subjects in Port Harcourt, Nigeria. A total of 302 female subjects (18-39 years) were recruited for the study. They consisted of 205 pregnant subjects and 97 non-pregnant subjects which served as the control. All subjects were screened for HIV type 1 and type 2 using standard test kits. Total and differential white blood cell counts were determined using a haematology auto analyzer while the total lymphocyte count (TLC) was obtained by multiplying total white blood cell count (TWC) with percentage lymphocyte count. The CD4 and CD8 cell counts were analyzed using the automated flow cytometry analyzer while the CD4:CD8 cell count ratio was obtained by dividing the CD4 cell count value by that of CD8. The result of the study shows a statistically significant decrease in CD4 and CD8 cell counts, lymphocyte and total lymphocyte counts and an increase in neutrophil count in all the trimesters of pregnancy when compared to the non-pregnant control (p<0.05). Also, there was a significant increase in WBC during the third trimester and a similar decrease in monocyte count in the first and third trimesters of pregnancy. The evidence from the present study concludes that pregnancy modifies the maternal immune response to ensure fetal survival and the protection of the mother from invading pathogens as reported in the increase in total WBC, neutrophil and monocyte counts and a reduction in TLC, CD4 and CD8 counts. The study recommends routine assessments of these crucial cellular immune markers for pregnant women during antenatal visits.
},
 year = {2024}
}

Copy | Download

TY  - JOUR
T1  - Assessment of CD4, CD8 and White Cell Parameters Amongst HIV Seronegative Pregnant Subjects in Port Harcourt, Nigeria

AU  - Solomon Ovomarani Akevwighome
AU  - Bruno Chukwuemeka Chinko
AU  - Sunday Ogbu Ojeka
AU  - Kinikanwo Innocent Green
AU  - Datonye Victor Dapper
Y1  - 2024/04/11
PY  - 2024
N1  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.sf.20240502.11
DO  - 10.11648/j.sf.20240502.11
T2  - Science Frontiers
JF  - Science Frontiers
JO  - Science Frontiers
SP  - 74
EP  - 80
PB  - Science Publishing Group
SN  - 2994-7030
UR  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.sf.20240502.11
AB  - Pregnancy involves maternal immunological adjustments to accommodate the fetus and maintain a strong immune defense against potential pathogens. The present study evaluated the changes in CD4, CD8, white blood cell (WBC) and total lymphocyte count (TLC) amongst HIV seronegative pregnant subjects in Port Harcourt, Nigeria. A total of 302 female subjects (18-39 years) were recruited for the study. They consisted of 205 pregnant subjects and 97 non-pregnant subjects which served as the control. All subjects were screened for HIV type 1 and type 2 using standard test kits. Total and differential white blood cell counts were determined using a haematology auto analyzer while the total lymphocyte count (TLC) was obtained by multiplying total white blood cell count (TWC) with percentage lymphocyte count. The CD4 and CD8 cell counts were analyzed using the automated flow cytometry analyzer while the CD4:CD8 cell count ratio was obtained by dividing the CD4 cell count value by that of CD8. The result of the study shows a statistically significant decrease in CD4 and CD8 cell counts, lymphocyte and total lymphocyte counts and an increase in neutrophil count in all the trimesters of pregnancy when compared to the non-pregnant control (p<0.05). Also, there was a significant increase in WBC during the third trimester and a similar decrease in monocyte count in the first and third trimesters of pregnancy. The evidence from the present study concludes that pregnancy modifies the maternal immune response to ensure fetal survival and the protection of the mother from invading pathogens as reported in the increase in total WBC, neutrophil and monocyte counts and a reduction in TLC, CD4 and CD8 counts. The study recommends routine assessments of these crucial cellular immune markers for pregnant women during antenatal visits.

VL  - 5
IS  - 2
ER  -

Copy | Download

Author Information

Solomon Ovomarani Akevwighome

Department of Human Physiology, Faculty of Basic Medical Sciences College of Health Sciences. University of Port Harcourt, Port Harcourt, Nigeria

Research Fields: Haematology-1, Body fluid-2, Immunology-3, Biomedical Sciences-4, HIV/AIDS-5

http://orcid.org/0009-0005-5607-9015
Bruno Chukwuemeka Chinko

Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Faculty of Clinical Sciences, College of Health Sciences, University of Port Harcourt, Port Harcourt, Nigeria

Research Fields: Blood and Body fluid Physiology-1, Immune Physiology-2, Ethno Pharmacology-3, Biomedical Sciences-4, General physiology-5

Contact Email

http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0457-2853
Sunday Ogbu Ojeka

Department of Human Physiology, Faculty of Basic Medical Sciences College of Health Sciences. University of Port Harcourt, Port Harcourt, Nigeria

Research Fields: Immune Physiology-1, Blood Physiology-2, HIV/AIDS-3, Reproductive Physiology-4, Antioxidants-5

http://orcid.org/0009-0001-9070-3468
Kinikanwo Innocent Green

Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Faculty of Clinical Sciences, College of Health Sciences, University of Port Harcourt, Port Harcourt, Nigeria

Research Fields: Obstetrics-1, Gynaecology-2, Reproductive Health-3, Endocrinology-4

http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4281-0883
Datonye Victor Dapper

Department of Human Physiology, Faculty of Basic Medical Sciences College of Health Sciences. University of Port Harcourt, Port Harcourt, Nigeria

Research Fields: Blood Physiology-1, Immune Physiology-2, HIV/AIDS-3, Endocrine Physiology-4, Human Physiology-5

http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1617-1686

Download PDF

Plain Text BibTeX RIS

APA Style

Akevwighome, S. O., Chinko, B. C., Ojeka, S. O., Green, K. I., Dapper, D. V. (2024). Assessment of CD4, CD8 and White Cell Parameters Amongst HIV Seronegative Pregnant Subjects in Port Harcourt, Nigeria. Science Frontiers, 5(2), 74-80. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.sf.20240502.11

Copy | Download

ACS Style

Akevwighome, S. O.; Chinko, B. C.; Ojeka, S. O.; Green, K. I.; Dapper, D. V. Assessment of CD4, CD8 and White Cell Parameters Amongst HIV Seronegative Pregnant Subjects in Port Harcourt, Nigeria. Sci. Front. 2024, 5(2), 74-80. doi: 10.11648/j.sf.20240502.11

Copy | Download

AMA Style

Akevwighome SO, Chinko BC, Ojeka SO, Green KI, Dapper DV. Assessment of CD4, CD8 and White Cell Parameters Amongst HIV Seronegative Pregnant Subjects in Port Harcourt, Nigeria. Sci Front. 2024;5(2):74-80. doi: 10.11648/j.sf.20240502.11

Copy | Download

@article{10.11648/j.sf.20240502.11,
  author = {Solomon Ovomarani Akevwighome and Bruno Chukwuemeka Chinko and Sunday Ogbu Ojeka and Kinikanwo Innocent Green and Datonye Victor Dapper},
  title = {Assessment of CD4, CD8 and White Cell Parameters Amongst HIV Seronegative Pregnant Subjects in Port Harcourt, Nigeria
},
  journal = {Science Frontiers},
  volume = {5},
  number = {2},
  pages = {74-80},
  doi = {10.11648/j.sf.20240502.11},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.sf.20240502.11},
  eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.sf.20240502.11},
  abstract = {Pregnancy involves maternal immunological adjustments to accommodate the fetus and maintain a strong immune defense against potential pathogens. The present study evaluated the changes in CD4, CD8, white blood cell (WBC) and total lymphocyte count (TLC) amongst HIV seronegative pregnant subjects in Port Harcourt, Nigeria. A total of 302 female subjects (18-39 years) were recruited for the study. They consisted of 205 pregnant subjects and 97 non-pregnant subjects which served as the control. All subjects were screened for HIV type 1 and type 2 using standard test kits. Total and differential white blood cell counts were determined using a haematology auto analyzer while the total lymphocyte count (TLC) was obtained by multiplying total white blood cell count (TWC) with percentage lymphocyte count. The CD4 and CD8 cell counts were analyzed using the automated flow cytometry analyzer while the CD4:CD8 cell count ratio was obtained by dividing the CD4 cell count value by that of CD8. The result of the study shows a statistically significant decrease in CD4 and CD8 cell counts, lymphocyte and total lymphocyte counts and an increase in neutrophil count in all the trimesters of pregnancy when compared to the non-pregnant control (p<0.05). Also, there was a significant increase in WBC during the third trimester and a similar decrease in monocyte count in the first and third trimesters of pregnancy. The evidence from the present study concludes that pregnancy modifies the maternal immune response to ensure fetal survival and the protection of the mother from invading pathogens as reported in the increase in total WBC, neutrophil and monocyte counts and a reduction in TLC, CD4 and CD8 counts. The study recommends routine assessments of these crucial cellular immune markers for pregnant women during antenatal visits.
},
 year = {2024}
}

Copy | Download

TY  - JOUR
T1  - Assessment of CD4, CD8 and White Cell Parameters Amongst HIV Seronegative Pregnant Subjects in Port Harcourt, Nigeria

AU  - Solomon Ovomarani Akevwighome
AU  - Bruno Chukwuemeka Chinko
AU  - Sunday Ogbu Ojeka
AU  - Kinikanwo Innocent Green
AU  - Datonye Victor Dapper
Y1  - 2024/04/11
PY  - 2024
N1  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.sf.20240502.11
DO  - 10.11648/j.sf.20240502.11
T2  - Science Frontiers
JF  - Science Frontiers
JO  - Science Frontiers
SP  - 74
EP  - 80
PB  - Science Publishing Group
SN  - 2994-7030
UR  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.sf.20240502.11
AB  - Pregnancy involves maternal immunological adjustments to accommodate the fetus and maintain a strong immune defense against potential pathogens. The present study evaluated the changes in CD4, CD8, white blood cell (WBC) and total lymphocyte count (TLC) amongst HIV seronegative pregnant subjects in Port Harcourt, Nigeria. A total of 302 female subjects (18-39 years) were recruited for the study. They consisted of 205 pregnant subjects and 97 non-pregnant subjects which served as the control. All subjects were screened for HIV type 1 and type 2 using standard test kits. Total and differential white blood cell counts were determined using a haematology auto analyzer while the total lymphocyte count (TLC) was obtained by multiplying total white blood cell count (TWC) with percentage lymphocyte count. The CD4 and CD8 cell counts were analyzed using the automated flow cytometry analyzer while the CD4:CD8 cell count ratio was obtained by dividing the CD4 cell count value by that of CD8. The result of the study shows a statistically significant decrease in CD4 and CD8 cell counts, lymphocyte and total lymphocyte counts and an increase in neutrophil count in all the trimesters of pregnancy when compared to the non-pregnant control (p<0.05). Also, there was a significant increase in WBC during the third trimester and a similar decrease in monocyte count in the first and third trimesters of pregnancy. The evidence from the present study concludes that pregnancy modifies the maternal immune response to ensure fetal survival and the protection of the mother from invading pathogens as reported in the increase in total WBC, neutrophil and monocyte counts and a reduction in TLC, CD4 and CD8 counts. The study recommends routine assessments of these crucial cellular immune markers for pregnant women during antenatal visits.

VL  - 5
IS  - 2
ER  -

Copy | Download